Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate school-based health center (SHBC) provider adherence to guidelines for identification and assessment of childhood obesity after participation in a virtual Health Disparities Learning Collaborative with and without HeartSmartKids (TM), decision-support technology with tailored patient education.Design and Setting: A cluster randomized comparative effectiveness trial was conducted with 24 SBHCs from six states.Participants: The sample consisted of 33 SBHC providers and review of medical charts at three time points. Chart data were collected at baseline (n = 850), after training (n = 691) and 6 months after training (n = 612).Main Outcome Measures: Charts from a random sample of youth 5-12 years making well-child visits were examined for the documentation of: BMI percentile, accurate weight diagnosis based upon BMI percentile, blood pressure percentile, and ordering appropriate laboratory assessment of obese youth >= 10 years old.Results: Percentage of overweight/obese children in this study was 40.4-47.2%. For both the HeartSmartKids (TM) and non-HeartSmartKids (TM) groups, provider adherence significantly improved after training for BMI percentile and blood pressure percentile documentation, as well as correct diagnosis for overweight and obese. Implementation of the HeartSmartKids (TM) was variable at the technology sites and differences in identification and assessment were not found between groups.Conclusion: The virtual collaborative approach to quality improvement resulted in improved adherence to guidelines for identification and assessment of overweight/obese children. The impact of the training with and without HeartSmartKids (TM) on patient outcomes needs to be evaluated. Coaching on implementation of technology needs to be included in future work.
Virtual obesity collaborative with and without decision-support technology
Literatuur
Auteur(s)
Gance-Cleveland, Bonnie; Aldrich, Heather; Schmiege, Sarah; Tyler, Karen
Jaar
2016
Bron
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE Volume: 28 Issue: 3 Pages: 316-323